With the explosion of scanners, digital cameras and the World
Wide Web, the JPEG image format has quickly become the most widely
used digital image format. It's also the most misunderstood. Here's
a collection of some common misconceptions and facts about JPEG
images.
Don't
believe everything you hear about JPEGs. Get the facts
here.
With
the explosion of scanners, digital cameras and the World Wide Web,
the JPEG image format has quickly become the most widely used
digital image format. It's also the most misunderstood. Here's a
collection of some common misconceptions and facts about JPEG
images.
JPEGs lose quality every time they are
opened and/or saved. False. Simply opening or
displaying a JPEG image does not harm the image in any way. Even
opening an image and saving it again under a new name will not
introduce further compression, unless additional editing was
performed on the image. Saving a JPEG repeatedly during the same
editing session (without ever closing the image) will not
accumulate a loss in quality.
JPEGs lose quality every time they are opened, edited and
saved. True. If a JPEG image is opened, edited, and saved
again it results in additional image degradation. It is very
important to minimize the number of editing sessions between the
initial and final version of a JPEG image. If you must perform
editing functions in several sessions or in several different
programs, you should use a image format that is not lossy (TIFF,
BMP, PNG) for the intermediate editing sessions before saving the
final version. Repeated saving within the same editing
session does not introduce additional damage. It is only when
the image is closed, re-opened, edited and saved again.
JPEGs lose quality every time they are used in a page
layout program. False. Using a JPEG Image in a page layout program
does not edit the source JPEG image, therefore no quality is
lost. However, because each page layout software uses different
types of compression on their native document files, you may find
your layout documents are considerably larger than the sum of the
embedded JPEG files.
If I compress a JPEG at 70%, then later reopen it and
compress it at 90%, the final image will be restored to a quality
setting of 90%. False. The initial save at 70% introduces a
permanent loss in quality that cannot be restored. Saving
again at 90% quality only introduces additional degradation to an
image that has already had considerable loss in quality. If you must
decompress and recompress a JPEG image, using the exact same
quality setting each time seems to introduce little or no
degradation to the unedited areas of the image. Because of the way
JPEGs are processed, however, the same setting rule just explained
does not apply when cropping an image. JPEG compression is
applied to an image in small blocks, typically 8 or 16 pixel
increments. When you crop a JPEG image, the entire image is shifted
so that the blocks are not aligned in the same places.
Choosing the same numeric quality setting for JPEGs saved
in one program will give the exact same results as the same numeric
quality setting in another program. False. Quality settings are not standardized
across graphics software programs. In other words, a quality setting
of 75 in one program may result in a much poorer image than the same
original image saved with a quality setting of 75 in another
program. It's also important to verify what your software is asking
for when you set the quality. Some programs have a numeric scale
with quality at the top of the scale so that a rating of 100 is the
highest quality with little compression. Other programs base the
scale on compression where a setting of 100 is the lowest quality
and the highest compression. Some software and digital cameras use
terminology like low, medium, and high for the quality settings. See
screen
shots of JPEG save options in various image editing software
programs.
A quality setting of 100 does not degrade an image at
all. False. Saving an image to JPEG format,
always introduces some loss in quality, though a quality
setting of 100 will usually not be detectable by the average naked
eye. In addition, using a quality setting of 100 compared to a
quality setting of 90-95 or so will result in a considerably higher
file size relative to the degree of image loss. If your software
does not provide a JPEG preview, try saving several copies of an
image at 90, 95, and 100 quality settings and compare file size with
image quality. Chances are, there will be no distinguishable
difference between the 90 and 100 image, but the difference in
k-bytes could be significant. Keep in mind, however, that subtle
color shifting is one effect of JPEG compression—even at high
quality settings—so JPEG should be avoided in situations where
precise color matching is important.
|